Ad Here  
March
April
May
June
July
August
 
 
Smart banking in smart cities Good, bad and ugly Indian customers are tech savvy Bottomlines shrink, bad loans rise... United India Insurance - Rs 110 crore losses have been claimed till now due to floods in Tamil Nadu It’s a war on black money, support it. Managing NPAs... How ‘secure’ are the secured loans? Ferrying digital banking to Lakshadweep The collaboration suite of cyber criminals Emerging crisis Well-lived... Small finance payment banks... Targets continue to be ad hoc Capital base of regional rural banks raised Growing volume of stressed assets… Small finance banks offer high interest rates Mega merger is on Drastic decline in asset quality Another route for achieving financial inclusion New capitals of Migrant banks Ernakulam excels... Holy or unholy? Small is ‘more’ beautiful The paradox: clamour for the Goliath and David Two banks: their jubilees and performances Payment banks have arrived Big bank merger, bigger expectations Who is the real beneficiary? A development bank for BRICS A new development bank rising in the east… Anytime banking to anywhere banking Banking on Risk Just 660 days! Target over-ambitious... Greet Lakshmi the banking robot Needed a Banking Atlas Financial inclusion vs unclaimed deposits Nothing much can happen…. Perhaps small is more beautiful than big! How okay are new banks? Cradle of banks to a smart city... Hesitancy in announcing year-end results Banking overhauling or reorganisation? Aadhaar, niraadhaar and banking Monetary policy continues to adopt dis-inflationary path All that glitters is not gold... Reaching out: is it slowing down? Grows Bigger Merger mania haunts banks From lazy banking to easy banking One down in private sector Reaching the Unreached… Why priority status? Growing gainfully Rationalised Governance in Reverse Gear? What is the priority – mergers or NPA reduction? Banking in Telangana New bank licences, at last... Fund healthcare clinics in villages... Why any time money? Lacklustre credit expansion Thirty more cities seek to become SMART A bank for women, by women Insatiable appetite for credit Too big to fail and too small to sail Cautious and considerate Stage set for Indian ‘avatar’ of foreign banks Cut in repo rate – lower than expected Bank deposits account for 46.3 per cent of household savings LVB- A supermarket of financial services Drop in SLR- sparing lendable resources
 
Banking on Risk
Banking is all about risk as the world learnt to its cost in 2008 when the shenanigans of a few big banks brought entire economies to their knees.

India escaped a meltdown, widely credited to the ‘safe’ banking practised by its banks, but the question remains as to how banks have actually fared in risk management and what the future holds.

The basic features of the sector, namely the dominance of government, owned banks (PSBs), continued reliance on the narrow banking model and the overarching role as the prime supporter of the government’s borrowing programme. All three are inter-related and have a deep bearing on their performance as well as in understanding risk management.

First, PSB dominance (over 75 per cent of total assets, deposits and advances) has meant a massive branch banking structure and a high-volume, low-value business model. Over 83 per cent of total borrowing accounts are small (under Rs 0.02 mn) and constitute about 10 per cent of total credit outstanding, with deposits and advances constituting about 75 per cent of the balance sheet, the cost of doing business is high, though it has led to the widespread reach of banking.

Secondly, a ‘narrow’ banking business model has led to a large reliance on interest spreads for profitability: about 88 per cent of income is from interest; foreign banks and private banks score over the PSBs in this regard- they have larger proportions of fee-based income that not only insulates them somewhat from credit risks but gives them better market valuations; the narrow banking model clearly limits profitability, since it is an accepted fact that banking is a low value-added activity commanding. This is amply borne out by the slim RoAs recorded by the sector (0.81 in 2013 and 1.04 in 2013), caused largely by PSBs ( RoA of 0.5 in 2014, down from 0.88 in 2013).

Unduly risk averse?

This brings us to the question of whether the narrow banking model has served us well or whether Indian banks have been unduly risk averse and forgone higher returns in the quest for safety. We can look at a few ratios to gauge the risk appetite of the sector.

The table represents averages over the past 5 years (2010-14). Overall Investment Deposit Ratio at about 35 is significant, considering the much lower statutory requirement (25 per cent), (over 75 per cent of investments are in government and approved securities). Non-approved securities were quite low for PSBs, while foreign and private banks had much higher shares. Consequently the CD ratio has remained around 77 (again, largely due to PSBs, while other banks had higher CD ratios).


Preference for safety…

There are several reasons for this apparent risk aversion. Historically, banks have been financing the bulk of the government’s market borrowing programme, which is why SLR ratios were as high as 35-40 per cent in the past. As if to offset this, these investments were allowed zero risk weights, which helped boost the CRAR, without actually raising additional capital. Further, there were restrictions on exposure to risky products (equity, derivatives and OTC products). Finally, with government as the owner of the major part of the system, there was no real shareholder pressure to improve returns on equity; nor was there a ‘culture’ of risk-taking, so to speak. The need to support government borrowing and other mandated forms of lending (priority sector), pre-empted resources for other avenues. This has become so operationally embedded that even with continuous lowering of SLR, investment ratios are well in excess, indicating preference for safety.

The subdued demand for bank credit and the mounting levels of NPAs also have much to do with the cautious approach to lending; but the fact remains that decades of narrow banking have dented innovation and risk taking. An important reason has been the need to shore up CRR for Basel 3 compliance, without raising massive amounts of capital, for which cutting down risk weighted assets was a softer-option.

1 2
Author :
Reported On :
Sector :
Shoulder :
RELATED NEWS
ABOUT IE
IE, the business magazine from south was launched in 1968 and pioneered business journalism in south. Through the 45 years IE has been focusing on well-presented and well-researched articles. When giants in the industry stumbled to keep pace with the digital revolution, IE stayed affixed embracing technology.
Read more
 
PRIVACY POLICY
Economist Communications Ltd is committed to ensuring that your privacy is protected.
Read more
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
You agree that your use of this Website and the purchase of the magazine will be governed by these terms and conditions.
Read more
 
CONTACT US
S-15, Industrial Estate,
Guindy,
Chennai - 600 032.
PHONE: +91 44 22501236
EMAIL: indecom1968@gmail.com