Ad Here  
August
September
October
November
December
January
 
 
All talk and hopefully, all action China's might - India's Weakness Siemens-Mitsubishi rival GE’s bid For Alstom takeover In US he was excellent... Trump and Netanyahu rule the headlines Modi in Washington 2015 Year in review A success? A failure? Or a fraud? Promise of 9 billion pounds in FDI A sense of oneness in a foreign land... Nuclear sabre-rattling takes centre stage A person will win. What the country might lose... East Asian and Indian Trump cards Auto component exports to UK brighten No longer a shining star When Americans help yuan to emerge a reserve currency... Let’s copy paste Happy birthday, Sharief Modi sharpens the look - east policy Two weeks of Trump The mid-air scare Media’s Modi phobia... May on back foot, advantage India? Move forward in fast forward mode Relentless hunt for trade deals... French elections and more The new state of terror National Security @ the cost of Privacy Pakistan – the siege within Worldwatch Institute’s Vital Signs The story of the diminishing value of the pound BBC stars in a vain vitriolic campaign 2016 Year in review Forget USA and UK for higher education And the Nobel goes to… Trump unconcerned and immune to scandals Trade prospects promising Bitten by the South American bug… Big O’s win The Japanese will rise again... London Bridge is falling down Doklam, for the home theatre? A mixed shopping bag When German consumers were paid for power consumed! The lions roar to growth... End of an extravaganza Of diversity and inclusion Maggie melts Why the hell are we refusing to learn?
 
When German consumers were paid for power consumed!

New York Times in a recent editorial referred to a strange offshoot of technology development- German power utilities generating abundance of solar power paying consumers for the use of power! 

Germany has spent over $ 300 bn (around Rs. 19,50,000 crore) on creating power generation capacity through harnessing solar power. There is the limitation of storing power produced in such abundance and it is also difficult to shutdown quickly conventional thermal power stations, that run on coal, oil, gas or nuclear, even for a technologically sound country like Germany!  Ruhr mines in Germany have large reserves of coal/lignite. For decades thermal power generation was in abundance due to coal, oil and gas as feedstock. Unlike its neighbours France and Belgium, Germany moved away from nuclear power and has focused on wind and solar power. The vast country with scarce population (of around 82 mn) also has large land mass for the erection of solar modules. Add to these the capacity to invest in storage and the technology to switch to the operations to optimum levels. 

The long-term energy policy for India envisages phasing out new power capacity based on lignite (from 2022) and coal-fired stations (from 2027). There is also the focus on adding large capacity under nuclear power. The likely installed capacity by end of 2026-27 would include 275,000 MW of renewables and 14,880 MW of nuclear power. While these plans are impressive, the task of managing the grid with such multiple fuel-based power stations is bound to be daunting. For one, the installed power capacity of India, presently at around 360,000 MW, is much larger than those of individual countries in Europe. The continental distances involved in transmitting power, the management of over 100 utilities by different states and private operators are humongous to say the least. Even at much more modest capacities of around 18,732 MW, TANGEDCO has a tough task on optimising the load; there are added complexities of the vast differences in the cost of power produced/procured from different sources. To ensure availability, the state has also been going for long term power purchase agreements at costs much higher than those in its own power generating stations or from central stations like Neyveli Lignite Corporation. With large capacities created for wind and solar power and fierce price competition, the state has also been able to purchase power through open bids at low prices. On consideration of economics, the state has to opt for buying power at most economical prices. In this bargain it has serious impacts on technical and contract issues; the former relates to the shutting down of load on base stations like nuclear and thermal coal and the latter to renerging on contracts concluded for power purchase at higher rates. 

The German experience offers invaluable lessons for planning to manage the surging non-conventional energy production. 



Reported On :
Sector :
Shoulder :
RELATED NEWS
ABOUT IE
IE, the business magazine from south was launched in 1968 and pioneered business journalism in south. Through the 45 years IE has been focusing on well-presented and well-researched articles. When giants in the industry stumbled to keep pace with the digital revolution, IE stayed affixed embracing technology.
Read more
 
PRIVACY POLICY
Economist Communications Ltd is committed to ensuring that your privacy is protected.
Read more
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
You agree that your use of this Website and the purchase of the magazine will be governed by these terms and conditions.
Read more
 
CONTACT US
S-15, Industrial Estate,
Guindy,
Chennai - 600 032.
PHONE: +91 44 22501236
EMAIL: indecom1968@gmail.com