Ad Here  
March
April
May
June
July
August
 
 
May on back foot, advantage India? BBC stars in a vain vitriolic campaign The mid-air scare End of an extravaganza Relentless hunt for trade deals... Big O’s win Two weeks of Trump When German consumers were paid for power consumed! A mixed shopping bag And the Nobel goes to… Trump unconcerned and immune to scandals 2016 Year in review Let’s copy paste Modi in Washington Auto component exports to UK brighten Pakistan – the siege within Maggie melts Doklam, for the home theatre? Modi sharpens the look - east policy The new state of terror All talk and hopefully, all action Trump and Netanyahu rule the headlines A sense of oneness in a foreign land... Why the hell are we refusing to learn? Of diversity and inclusion Media’s Modi phobia... The story of the diminishing value of the pound China's might - India's Weakness Move forward in fast forward mode Forget USA and UK for higher education Siemens-Mitsubishi rival GE’s bid For Alstom takeover 2015 Year in review East Asian and Indian Trump cards Worldwatch Institute’s Vital Signs The Japanese will rise again... In US he was excellent... No longer a shining star When Americans help yuan to emerge a reserve currency... A success? A failure? Or a fraud? Bitten by the South American bug… Trade prospects promising Nuclear sabre-rattling takes centre stage Promise of 9 billion pounds in FDI The lions roar to growth... National Security @ the cost of Privacy A person will win. What the country might lose... Happy birthday, Sharief London Bridge is falling down French elections and more
 
When German consumers were paid for power consumed!

New York Times in a recent editorial referred to a strange offshoot of technology development- German power utilities generating abundance of solar power paying consumers for the use of power! 

Germany has spent over $ 300 bn (around Rs. 19,50,000 crore) on creating power generation capacity through harnessing solar power. There is the limitation of storing power produced in such abundance and it is also difficult to shutdown quickly conventional thermal power stations, that run on coal, oil, gas or nuclear, even for a technologically sound country like Germany!  Ruhr mines in Germany have large reserves of coal/lignite. For decades thermal power generation was in abundance due to coal, oil and gas as feedstock. Unlike its neighbours France and Belgium, Germany moved away from nuclear power and has focused on wind and solar power. The vast country with scarce population (of around 82 mn) also has large land mass for the erection of solar modules. Add to these the capacity to invest in storage and the technology to switch to the operations to optimum levels. 

The long-term energy policy for India envisages phasing out new power capacity based on lignite (from 2022) and coal-fired stations (from 2027). There is also the focus on adding large capacity under nuclear power. The likely installed capacity by end of 2026-27 would include 275,000 MW of renewables and 14,880 MW of nuclear power. While these plans are impressive, the task of managing the grid with such multiple fuel-based power stations is bound to be daunting. For one, the installed power capacity of India, presently at around 360,000 MW, is much larger than those of individual countries in Europe. The continental distances involved in transmitting power, the management of over 100 utilities by different states and private operators are humongous to say the least. Even at much more modest capacities of around 18,732 MW, TANGEDCO has a tough task on optimising the load; there are added complexities of the vast differences in the cost of power produced/procured from different sources. To ensure availability, the state has also been going for long term power purchase agreements at costs much higher than those in its own power generating stations or from central stations like Neyveli Lignite Corporation. With large capacities created for wind and solar power and fierce price competition, the state has also been able to purchase power through open bids at low prices. On consideration of economics, the state has to opt for buying power at most economical prices. In this bargain it has serious impacts on technical and contract issues; the former relates to the shutting down of load on base stations like nuclear and thermal coal and the latter to renerging on contracts concluded for power purchase at higher rates. 

The German experience offers invaluable lessons for planning to manage the surging non-conventional energy production. 



Reported On :
Sector :
Shoulder :
RELATED NEWS
ABOUT IE
IE, the business magazine from south was launched in 1968 and pioneered business journalism in south. Through the 45 years IE has been focusing on well-presented and well-researched articles. When giants in the industry stumbled to keep pace with the digital revolution, IE stayed affixed embracing technology.
Read more
 
PRIVACY POLICY
Economist Communications Ltd is committed to ensuring that your privacy is protected.
Read more
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
You agree that your use of this Website and the purchase of the magazine will be governed by these terms and conditions.
Read more
 
CONTACT US
S-15, Industrial Estate,
Guindy,
Chennai - 600 032.
PHONE: +91 44 22501236
EMAIL: indecom1968@gmail.com