Ad Here  
June
July
August
September
October
November
 
 
Last stages LVB posts 31 per cent growth in Q1 net profit Increasing market share From the toughest to the best year Michelin to double Chennai capacity IOB on turnaround path Hindalco – re-rating Carnival Films acquiring 3000 screens pan India TVS Automobile invests Rs.75 crore in start-up firms Tata Motors charts investments in PV and CV businesses Welcome focus to improve rural India... Kone India eyes further growth in elevator market Sivasankaran enters taxi space to take on Uber and Ola L&T bags the Mumbai Trans-harbour link order Shriram Life clocks more than Rs.1000 crore premium in 2015-16 Smooth sailing of SAIL Preparing for the next growth curve The unexpected exit Ponni Sugars (Erode) Ltd: not so sweet 2012-13 A welcome initiative-even critics are recognised When small is not so beautiful… PSU non-life firms seek to protect share The gainers and the losers M & M unveils driverless technology for tractors He excels in the nuts and bolts of entrepreneurship Right to privacy – now it’s fundamental! Vellayan is back, after 150 days PPP model for infrastructure development Tata Motors bets on new launches Consolidating leadership position in smartphones Eyes strong growth in 2016-17 New India Assurance posts impressive show Ode to Ratan Tata AL introduces Guru & Partner Chinese smart phones flourish in small towns too! 29 per cent jump in TCS revenues Gamesa to set up a plant in Nellore CAPITAL NOTES V-Guard launches app-enabled water heater system Nissan exit shouldn’t affect ALL Wabco launches safety system Dish TV – subscriber additions encouraging Tata gets 4-star rating for Zest Bajaj Finserv – Q1: fare well Back in growth mode Record two-wheeler sales TI Cycles plans retail expansion to drive sales for premium bicycles L&T profit up by 11 per cent Smartphone onslaught by Chinese brands L & T’s floating dock for navy Singur minus Nano – victory or folly? TN government keen on revival of operations at Nokia complex AL wins Deming prize again TVS Srichakra plans capacity expansion RoC in the dock... Titan Company – sales recovery to kick in Toyota and Suzuki to introduce EVs in India by 2020 Yamaha unveils scooter boutique Is this a generation gap? Mercedes-Benz sales continue to zoom Hyundai India achieves 7 mn production at Chennai factory ITC chairman calls for policy impetus to transform agriculture HPCL plans Rs.61,000 crore capex over 5-years E.I.D Parry (India) Ltd: another sweet year Maruti – for young buyers Tata Motors joins compact SUV bandwagon with Nexon Emami – a new growth mantra Hyundai to focus on SUVs and AMT variants It takes two to tango A niche in FMCG business... L & T set bigger ambitions in defence business Land wars Forging industry worried over lower supply of steel and its price Aurobindo Pharmacy: good turnaround Daimler’s truck exports from Chennai cross 5000 units Tata Steel, ThyssenKrupp sign MoU to merge European units Daimler grows sales and share in India ITC – steep excise hike Tata Motors aims to be among the Top 3 global CV & PV firm Are they really independent? Rane targets Rs.5500 crore topline by 2018-19 AL secures orders for 3600 buses Housing demand revival Solar installations exceed 2015 capacity in five months Sundram Fasteners rejigs international
 
Are they really independent?
The idea of the independent directors is simple. They are expected to be independent from the management and act as the trustees of shareholders. This implies that they are obligated to question the conduct of organisations on relevant issues.

For India 2009 is of great significance with respect to independent directors. More than 600 independent directors resigned that year.  Two events triggered the exodus. One, Nimesh Kampani, the independent director of Nagarjuna Finance, faced the regulators’ wrath for the company’s inability to return money to the depositors. Also that year the Satyam fiasco happened and on its Board that time was, among others, Krishna Palepu and Vinod Dham. The former was a Harvard Professor and the latter was the man who gave Pentium processors to the world. Satyam investors lost more than Rs. 13,000 cr. The investors blamed the independent directors and auditors.    

The ghost of 2009 is back to haunt the independent directors. These directors of Satyam have been fined for not being able to protect the interest of the shareholders in the Satyam fraud. The illustrious professor Krishna Palepu has been fined more than Rs. 2.5 crore for having conflict of interest, as he was also a paid strategic advisor for the company. Further, other independent directors have been fined Rs 20,000 each. This is a landmark judgment, as the role of independent directors would now invite higher degree of supervision. The point of discussion here is: are the independent directors in a position to deliver?

 

The ‘agency’ problem...

Traditional finance states the main objective of an organisation is to maximise the wealth of investors. However, the managers who run the organisation and the people who invest are not always the same. Thus, there is a possibility of conflict of interest between the investors and the managers. Further, the salaries of top executives are often linked to the profits of the company. Thus manager gains by maximising company’s profits in short run rather than maximise wealth.  This is called the agency problem.

The independent directors are appointed to protect the interest of the shareholders and hence their main efforts should be directed to reduce agency problems.  However, independent directors do not seem to be in position to do so. In a seminal paper Understanding Enron: It’s About the Gatekeepers, Stupid” John Coffee Jr has pointed out that the independent directors generally fail to protect the interest of the shareholders. Further, in the book ‘Barbarians at the Gate’ the authors have shown how independent directors are given consultancy projects to get them to ignore excessive perks and salaries of top executives. So why do independent directors fail? Can the directors really do something if they are inclined to protect the interest of the shareholders?


Independent directors’ view …

In 2009, the regulations for independent directors and the power of directors were grey areas. Even though it was mandatory for every company to have an independent director, no one was sure what the role of this director was. Readers would be surprised to know that most of the independent directors who were interviewed by researchers Vikramaditya Khanna and Shaun J Matthew in 2010 for their research paper ‘The Role of independent directors in controlled firms in India: Preliminary Interview Evidencer,’ viewed their role to be that of strategic consultants rather than whistle blowers. The blame cannot be fixed on the independent directors for the same. As discussions held in board meetings were subject to confidentiality clause, one independent board of director could not do much single-handed. He could not effectively act as a whistle blower.

Things have changed from 2009. According to the new Companies Act, the majority of directors in committees such as audit committee and nomination and remuneration committee, should be independent directors.  The regulations have now become tighter. The number of meetings has increased and so has the involvement of the independent director. However, experts still believe it is not possible for independent directors to protect the interest of shareholders.

 

Practical difficulties...

It is common knowledge that the promoter has the final say in the appointment of independent directors. Then how does one expect the independent directors to act without being influenced? The role of independent director in itself is paradoxical, as he independently needs to monitor the activities of individuals who appoint him. With resignation being the only effective tool in the hand of the directors such punitive action as doled by the Hyderabad court would only deter individuals of repute from taking the role of independent directors. Gatekeepers should be gatekeepers and given the weapons needed in the form of regulatory support to protect them.

Author :
Reported On :
Sector :
Shoulder :
RELATED NEWS
ABOUT IE
IE, the business magazine from south was launched in 1968 and pioneered business journalism in south. Through the 45 years IE has been focusing on well-presented and well-researched articles. When giants in the industry stumbled to keep pace with the digital revolution, IE stayed affixed embracing technology.
Read more
 
PRIVACY POLICY
Economist Communications Ltd is committed to ensuring that your privacy is protected.
Read more
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
You agree that your use of this Website and the purchase of the magazine will be governed by these terms and conditions.
Read more
 
CONTACT US
S-15, Industrial Estate,
Guindy,
Chennai - 600 032.
PHONE: +91 44 22501236
EMAIL: indecom1968@gmail.com