Ad Here  
April
May
June
July
August
September
 
 
Cut oil subsidy, get quality education Demolition experts: provide alternatives Doomed varsities and demented VCs Guideline to frame education Sustain academic quality Back on track... College of Engineering, Pune Road to nowhere How literate is young India? Higher EduCaution Skilling the unskilled: a silent change PPP mode for upgrading government schools… Saving students and parents For probity in medical admissions Why this dismal performance? Namakkal broiler schools More than just number crunchers... Sluggish growth in employment 65 per cent of future jobs don’t exist today Welcome revival of transparency Marching towards Centenary Corporation and corporates should join hands... Imperative to revamp educational infrastructure Stop official interference House of cards... Expanding access to education Where is the quality in RTE? A change that assures change... Higher education councils in doldrums
 
Back on track...
I have in the past written about how MIDS has been losing its original focus on development and economics. As one closely associated with the founder, Malcolm Adiseshiah, I have often recalled the initial years of close collaboration between MIDS and the Government of Tamil Nadu as also the numerous seminars on development issues the institute organised.

It is gratifying to notice MIDS re-railing the focus on economic issues. There is a welcome flurry of lectures. The New Year began with an international conference on achieving accelerated manufacturing growth. There was active participation by the British Northern Universities India Forum, Brookings Institute, ICRIER and several senior administrators from the Government of Tamil Nadu - C V Shankar, K Shanmugam, S Krishnan, Kumar Jayanth, M Velmurugan. MIDS Chairman, K L Krishna and Director Shashanka Bhide deserve praise for this change in emphasis.

Subir Gokarn, Director of Research, Brookings India provided the theme in perspective. He listed the demographic dividend, with a large working population in countries like India, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Pakistan and Vietnam having the

potential to make manufacturing competitive. He pointed to the absence of sectoral transition of employment: the share of employment in agriculture has not reduced substantially though a share of this sector in GDP has fallen steeply, he pointed out.

Gokarn described the determinants of manufacturing competitiveness as exchange rate, inflation and trading patterns. He pointed to the limited scope for leveraging any of these. The economist referred to scale as a huge factor and pointed to what it means: “in 1991, India produced around 100,000 cars and today 4 million. Likewise in television, refrigerators, and air conditioners… everywhere production has grown many times since then. Due to the scale, prices have been stable and competitive.” Gokarn summed up the current as the race against the machine and job-solescence.

An interesting feature of the conference was the frank expression of views by senior civil servants. Additional Chief Secretary, Industries, C V Sankar referred to the strong cultural heritage of Tamil Nadu that was skills-rich and had a reputation for sea-faring to far away lands. “The social infrastructure is quite strong with over 500 engineering colleges and one of the best health infrastructures,” he said. He voiced concern over the quality of engineers and technicians and the government’s efforts in addressing these.

Finance Secretary K Shanmugam pointed to the strong manufacturing base with the sector accounting for 30 per cent of the state’s GDP.  Shanmugam pointed to a few issues of concern. One, the intense competition in the garments sector among developing countries that results in large scale shifting of employment. Two, the intense price competition from China that impacts on the manufacturing units and cited an instance: “the Tamil Nadu government allotted in its budget Rs 2000 crore for supplying fans, mixies and grinders for free. But fans and mixies are imported from China. All laptops come from China. We have to become more competitive.” Shanmugam concluded that if the manufacturing sector is not innovative it will die and pointed to Detroit as an example.

The seminar laid emphasis on the SME sector, that provides for lot of employment and receive a lot of government support like capital subsidy. In my address I pointed to some of the deficiencies of the MSME sector. I cited the experience of such units in Guindy that pioneered the concept of industrial estates. Over 90 per cent of such manufacturing units, which once had the reputation for skills and excellence, are today extinct. They lack scale, thanks to the capital limit (and not employment) as the criterion; because of the small scale of operations and reservation several products for the small sector, there was the tendency to proliferate more number of small units in different names rather than build up size. The priority enjoyed by these in terms of lower interest vanished in the 1990s. Capital subsidy liberally provided is mired in corruption and red tape.

Director Bhide promised to hold more such conferences in quicker intervals. One should look forward to these. Adisheshiah in heaven should be quite pleased with this turn.

Author :
Reported On :
Sector :
Shoulder :
RELATED NEWS
ABOUT IE
IE, the business magazine from south was launched in 1968 and pioneered business journalism in south. Through the 45 years IE has been focusing on well-presented and well-researched articles. When giants in the industry stumbled to keep pace with the digital revolution, IE stayed affixed embracing technology.
Read more
 
PRIVACY POLICY
Economist Communications Ltd is committed to ensuring that your privacy is protected.
Read more
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
You agree that your use of this Website and the purchase of the magazine will be governed by these terms and conditions.
Read more
 
CONTACT US
S-15, Industrial Estate,
Guindy,
Chennai - 600 032.
PHONE: +91 44 22501236
EMAIL: indecom1968@gmail.com