Ad Here  
May
June
July
August
September
October
 
 
An eventful week with VVIPs of Delhi Focus on agriculture and human resources A historic indirect tax reform After all, customer is the king Public investments and welfare will surge Breaking news or breaking credibility? TN - so much to offer... Deming awardees galore! Cleansing Indian retail Focus on southern TN... Low profile moves CSR, tech revolution and bank crisis Welcome rains for damaged roads... Miles to go... Tax evaders’ get out of Jail-Free Card Rail-road Rajaraman Trail-blazing Tamil Nadu Welcome Measures. Work for 10X Change How will it PAN OUT In the horns of a dilemma Wanted: decentralised financial system Land, land everywhere, but... Industry can’t get it from Mars, yet A tale of two Bihar babus A dual GST that will protect prosperous states Indian GST – Between extremes… Why throw baby with bath water? Sardar Sarovar – the seventy year itch When the examiner cheated... Pool energy prices If not Tamil Nadu, where else? The deluge and the several kindly souls Economy through the month Skewed Economic Zones? Need for radical RBI reform You too T M Krishna? Jobs - Lost, Changed or Gained Strategic planning the missing link Babes In the wood-RBI North block has little clue to curb inflation MS Installed Policy Makers South India’s 100 most valuable companies Much ado about nothing The Great Fall Well-administered State Two welcome measures from the chief minister... Truce at Kasturi Buildings 1800 parties registered with EC – Less than 60 contest elections Outward ho INDIA keeps its date with destiny Little surplus after salaries, subsidies and debt servicing Chennai Airport-Ready for a rapid take off... Tryst with GST Kudos to GIM organisers... A blueprint for the future Why (not) abolish? Ganesh’s mantras Much can be done by us Sowing seeds of hope PC please be our Santa It’s raining funds for states. Really? An eco-friendly commute in Mysuru Better relations with UK... BJP can now hasten its thrust for reforms A gratifying record Healthy finances of the Chennai Corporation What the big B should offer? Sustainably developing manufacturing sector… Weaving wealth of western Tamil Nadu Welcome move to widen the tax net… Oh my GOLD Reform this licence to…kill Need plan over the long term planning Babes In the wood-RBI North block has little clue to curb inflation Research for survival... Star of the South No groundnuts in groundnut oil! Technology and economic development should be linked A Fine division of responsibilities They add lustre to Padma Awards Make way for Make in India... CAD and the emergency thereof
 
Wanted: decentralised financial system
A vast country such as India needs a decentralised financial system.A top-down approach from Mumbai is incompatible with the idiosyncrasies of regional and local financial needs and demands. Radical re-design of the financial system is called for if India is to achieve true financial inclusion.
FINANCIAL INCLUSION IS the flavour of the day. No financial sector seminar or conference these days goes through without participants holding forth on how financial inclusion is critical in India and how to go about attaining that. Indian policy makers have been labouring with this concept for a much longer time. From regional rural banks to local area banks to mobile and SMS banking, various models have been tried and continue to be tried to achieve financial inclusion. Unfortunately, nothing much seems to be making a dent on the problem of financial exclusion. A recent Bank Economists’ Conference in Mumbai also had a panel discussion on the subject but titled a shade differently – “how to profitably capture the financial services opportunities in the rural areas?” 

What is the market?

When we talk of rural financial services opportunity, we have to be clear about what actually is the target market.

The rural population in India is close to 700 million. This population is engaged in both agricultural and non-agricultural income earning activities, though the bulk of their income is from agricultural activities only.

The rural sector broadly accounts for some 25 per cent of total national income – comprising 20 per cent from purely agricultural activities and 5 per cent from non-agricultural activities.  

Per capita income in the rural sector is approximately Rs.20,000 per annum – this is an overall average and subsumes a range of incomes. The dispersion of incomes will be quite large considering that 75 per cent of the rural population is in the bottom 3 income / wealth quintiles.  

Therefore, when we talk of rural financial services opportunity, are we talking about this 75 per cent of the rural population or the 25 per cent of the population which is in the top 2 income / wealth brackets? 

Will mainline financial institutions such as banks find business opportunities in the bottom rungs of the rural income / wealth distribution “bankable?” 

With low per capita incomes and skewed income / wealth distribution, mainstream financial institutions are likely to find it difficult to fashion a workable and profitable business model in this segment. (“Workable” and “profitable” business models, of course, have to be understood from the mainstream institutions’ perspective and their reliance on a set of financial / security criteria which makes lending opportunities credit-worthy!)

That it has not been proving attractive for them is clear from the fact that 70 per cent of the rural population does not have a bank account. The extent of exclusion from the credit markets is equally large. Out of close to 150 million rural households (of which there are 100 million farming households) in the country, some 75 per cent have no access to formal sources of credit while 50 per cent does not have access to even informal sources of credit.

Fundamental re-design towards MFIs is imperative

So, obviously, when we talk of profitably capturing financial services opportunities in the rural sector, we have to talk about some fundamental re-designing of the financial system and its delivery mechanisms – the emphasis has to be on non-banking financial intermediaries who have the requisite distribution and last-mile reach into the hinterland and the requisite credit disbursement, administration and risk mitigation skills.  

The rapid strides made by micro-finance non-banks (micro finance institutions or MFIs) in recent years is testimony to the business opportunities and what kind of financial infrastructure – in terms of credit disbursement, risk management and administration,... - is needed to tap into that opportunity.  

To be sure, there has been dissonance in how the micro finance model has operated and that has led to some friction in the system. But those aberrations and obstacles do not deny the fact that the micro model possibly provides the best mechanism to “profitably” provide organised financial services to large sections of the rural population.

The policy emphasis should therefore be on strengthening the micro finance and micro credit infrastructure – both in terms of better governance practices and in terms of channelising more lendable resources to MFIs from the organised banking system. If not the banking system, policy makers should actively work to facilitate increased access for the MFIs to the broader capital markets - either through securitisation or through  ore conventional borrowing instruments such as retail deposits and debentures.

MFI model implies decentralisation

The MFI model means significant decentralisation of the system of financial intermediation in the country. Local and region-focused financial intermediation is what is called for in this vast country of ours. That this is the norm in countries with large geographies is amply demonstrated by the US model where thousands of region and area focused lenders / banks and other specialised types of financial institutions such as rural banks, mutual savings and credit unions operate alongside the “mainstream” commercial banks. There are some 8000 commercial banks in the US and but for some 40 banks headquartered in the major cities of that country, the rest are dispersed far and wide in that vast country. 

If that is so in the US, it should be more so in India, which has a much larger population and also a much higher share of the population outside the mainstream financial system. 

Mumbai: Make way for others

There has to be a decisive shift away from the top-down and centralised nature of the current financial system where mainstream financial institutions – like complying with the letter of the law – mechanically open and operate rural and semi-urban branch offices but without having any noticeable impact on the level of financial inclusion. 

It is obvious that in such a decentralised system of financial intermediation, financial regulation and supervision also has to acquire a distinctive decentralised and regional focus. We cannot have one superfinancial regulator sitting in Mumbai and making regulatory policy on the thousands of region- ocused and region-specialised financial institutions operating across the country. 

There can be one monetary policy for the entire country – that is, a policy which varies the degree of liquidity and monetary conditions at the aggregate level to steer the price of money to a desired level and in a desired direction. A single monetary policy for the entire country is natural since the country is politically unified, has a single currency and administratively functions under the same set of laws, rules and systems. 

But, there cannot be one super regulator for an entire financial system that aspires for a decentralised focus. Again, the inspiration should come from the US where the Federal Reserve makes monetary policy for the entire country but regulation and supervision is dispersed at the regional level.  

Critics may wonder why and how an example is being made of the US financial model, particularly in the backdrop of the global financial crisis that originated in the US. 

To answer that, it may be pertinent to point out that a nuanced reading and understanding of the US model and the global experience since 2007 -2008 is called for. It should be noted that the financial crisis erupted in a part of the US financial system that was supervised at the national level. A significant part of the blame for the excesses that built up in the US financial system can be attributed to a colossal regulatory and supervisory failure at the national level.  

That does not detract in any way from the validity and importance of the decentralised US financial model. It is important to learn lessons from history but equally important to learn the right lessons.
Author :
Reported On :
Sector :
RELATED NEWS
ABOUT IE
IE, the business magazine from south was launched in 1968 and pioneered business journalism in south. Through the 45 years IE has been focusing on well-presented and well-researched articles. When giants in the industry stumbled to keep pace with the digital revolution, IE stayed affixed embracing technology.
Read more
 
PRIVACY POLICY
Economist Communications Ltd is committed to ensuring that your privacy is protected.
Read more
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
You agree that your use of this Website and the purchase of the magazine will be governed by these terms and conditions.
Read more
 
CONTACT US
S-15, Industrial Estate,
Guindy,
Chennai - 600 032.
PHONE: +91 44 22501236
EMAIL: indecom1968@gmail.com