Ad Here  
December
January
February
March
April
May
 
 
No groundnuts in groundnut oil! Policy Makers Tax evaders’ get out of Jail-Free Card Miles to go... MS Installed Research for survival... Strategic planning the missing link Little surplus after salaries, subsidies and debt servicing TN - so much to offer... The Great Fall Indian GST – Between extremes… Deming awardees galore! Focus on southern TN... Weaving wealth of western Tamil Nadu After all, customer is the king 1800 parties registered with EC – Less than 60 contest elections A gratifying record Much ado about nothing Technology and economic development should be linked Sowing seeds of hope Why throw baby with bath water? Healthy finances of the Chennai Corporation Cleansing Indian retail BJP can now hasten its thrust for reforms Chennai Airport-Ready for a rapid take off... Wanted: decentralised financial system It’s raining funds for states. Really? In the horns of a dilemma Make way for Make in India... Pool energy prices Welcome rains for damaged roads... Truce at Kasturi Buildings Babes In the wood-RBI North block has little clue to curb inflation Welcome Measures. Work for 10X Change Kudos to GIM organisers... Star of the South What the big B should offer? Low profile moves PC please be our Santa They add lustre to Padma Awards Land, land everywhere, but... Industry can’t get it from Mars, yet An eco-friendly commute in Mysuru When the examiner cheated... The deluge and the several kindly souls CAD and the emergency thereof A Fine division of responsibilities A blueprint for the future Jobs - Lost, Changed or Gained Well-administered State Sardar Sarovar – the seventy year itch Trail-blazing Tamil Nadu Welcome move to widen the tax net… Outward ho Economy through the month Tryst with GST Need for radical RBI reform A tale of two Bihar babus Oh my GOLD CSR, tech revolution and bank crisis Why (not) abolish? Sustainably developing manufacturing sector… Babes In the wood-RBI North block has little clue to curb inflation An eventful week with VVIPs of Delhi Rail-road Rajaraman A dual GST that will protect prosperous states Two welcome measures from the chief minister... Much can be done by us Focus on agriculture and human resources If not Tamil Nadu, where else? Need plan over the long term planning INDIA keeps its date with destiny Ganesh’s mantras Breaking news or breaking credibility? Public investments and welfare will surge Reform this licence to…kill Skewed Economic Zones? You too T M Krishna? Better relations with UK... South India’s 100 most valuable companies A historic indirect tax reform How will it PAN OUT
 
Tax evaders’ get out of Jail-Free Card
Had Benjamin Franklin been acquainted with the 64,275 persons who successfully evaded taxes in India, he would have reconsidered his pronouncement that “in this world, nothing can be said to be certain except death and taxes.”

Voluntary Disclosure of Income Schemes (VDIS) are hardly unconventional in India governments have repeatedly resorted to these schemes as shortcuts to quickly collect unaccounted-for money. Between 1951 and 1997, ten such schemes were implemented, although the only one that resulted in noteworthy collections was the one in 1997, with a collection of Rs. 30,000 crore. At a tax rate of 30 per cent for individuals and 35 per cent for corporates, the government’s piggy bank was richer by Rs. 9500 crore.

These schemes were always met with harsh criticism and the derision of many, including a Comptroller and Auditor General who wrote a scathing report about the gaping holes in such schemes. The much-aggrieved All-India Federation of Tax Practitioners filed a petition with the Supreme Court in 1997, and the government was forbidden from undertaking such schemes in future without prior Court approval.

However, the BJP managed to find, or create, a loophole, by vehemently denying that the 2016 VDIS falls under the definition of an ‘amnesty’ scheme. As per the 2016 VDIS, tax evaders can come clean by paying tax at 45 per cent on previously undisclosed income and avoid further penalties and prosecution under various acts – truthfully, not all that different from past tax amnesty schemes. It should be of some comfort to compliant citizens that the 2016 scheme requires defaulters to pay taxes higher than at the prevailing rate, which was not the case with the 1997 scheme.

This is the BJP’s second shot at playing cops-and-robbers with errant taxpayers. In 2015, a similar window was opened to disclose black money stashed overseas but this went largely ignored, with only around Rs. 4000 crore worth of declarations made.

The 2016 VDIS, however, was a success.  According to the government, around Rs. 65,000 crore of undisclosed assets have been declared, yielding over Rs. 30,000 crore in taxes. While speculation has been rife about who paid how much, the government has maintained that it will not disclose state-wise or trade-wise information and that the identities of the declarants will be kept confidential.

This did not discourage the media and there was a flurry of news reports claiming that the highest amount declared came from Hyderabad and that the single largest declarant was a Hyderabadi businessman who disclosed Rs. 10,000 crore. Apparently, roadside eateries in Mumbai declared Rs. 50 crore in cash. Tax authorities swooped down on close to 200 eateries in and around Mumbai over the last few weeks of the scheme.

While tax amnesty schemes have been implemented worldwide, they are notorious for their unpredictable degrees of success. They are considered a stopgap, lazy solution and their effectiveness in tackling tax evasion is questionable. There is no right answer to the over arching question of whether these schemes are morally and socially ethical. Not only do they demoralise honest taxpayers, they can also be viewed as a sign of government’s incompetence in properly enforcing its tax laws.

Experts believe that such schemes are too lenient an approach when instead the government should be taking strict action against tax evaders who, once threatened, would fall in line out of fear of incarceration. By offering them an opportunity to get away unscathed despite flouting rules, governments could be encouraging evasion. By making evasion forgivable and even legitimate, they might be reducing voluntary compliances. Statistics corroborate this worry by confirming that, in developing countries, amnesties tend to diminish the chances of implementing a successful tax programme. However, one cannot completely disregard the benefits of an instant revenue bonanza, as well as the repatriation of funds that would have otherwise remained elusive. In a country where only around 3 per cent of the population pays taxes, this is big money and money that 

India unquestionably needs. These schemes also supply the government with a list of citizens who ought to be closely monitored. To prove long-term efficacy, it is imperative to immediately follow it up with structural reform.

The carrot-or-stick dilemma will forever remain the subject of debate. What is clear is that the implementation of tax amnesty should not be a quick fix that is adopted at will, but instead a brief prelude before stringent regulations with severe consequences are brought into force. 

Author :
Reported On :
Sector :
Shoulder :
RELATED NEWS
ABOUT IE
IE, the business magazine from south was launched in 1968 and pioneered business journalism in south. Through the 45 years IE has been focusing on well-presented and well-researched articles. When giants in the industry stumbled to keep pace with the digital revolution, IE stayed affixed embracing technology.
Read more
 
PRIVACY POLICY
Economist Communications Ltd is committed to ensuring that your privacy is protected.
Read more
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
You agree that your use of this Website and the purchase of the magazine will be governed by these terms and conditions.
Read more
 
CONTACT US
S-15, Industrial Estate,
Guindy,
Chennai - 600 032.
PHONE: +91 44 22501236
EMAIL: indecom1968@gmail.com