Ad Here  
June
July
August
September
October
November
 
 
Shriram Life clocks more than Rs.1000 crore premium in 2015-16 Emami – a new growth mantra Smartphone onslaught by Chinese brands Smooth sailing of SAIL The gainers and the losers LVB posts 31 per cent growth in Q1 net profit Titan Company – sales recovery to kick in AL introduces Guru & Partner RoC in the dock... Daimler grows sales and share in India Maruti – for young buyers Tata Motors bets on new launches PPP model for infrastructure development Hyundai to focus on SUVs and AMT variants Forging industry worried over lower supply of steel and its price Sivasankaran enters taxi space to take on Uber and Ola TVS Srichakra plans capacity expansion Solar installations exceed 2015 capacity in five months Carnival Films acquiring 3000 screens pan India Wabco launches safety system A niche in FMCG business... Ponni Sugars (Erode) Ltd: not so sweet 2012-13 From the toughest to the best year Land wars A welcome initiative-even critics are recognised CAPITAL NOTES Aurobindo Pharmacy: good turnaround Tata Motors joins compact SUV bandwagon with Nexon TI Cycles plans retail expansion to drive sales for premium bicycles Vellayan is back, after 150 days IOB on turnaround path ITC chairman calls for policy impetus to transform agriculture TN government keen on revival of operations at Nokia complex Hindalco – re-rating Chinese smart phones flourish in small towns too! L&T bags the Mumbai Trans-harbour link order Is this a generation gap? Bajaj Finserv – Q1: fare well Housing demand revival L & T set bigger ambitions in defence business Michelin to double Chennai capacity Increasing market share Record two-wheeler sales Eyes strong growth in 2016-17 AL secures orders for 3600 buses HPCL plans Rs.61,000 crore capex over 5-years Singur minus Nano – victory or folly? L & T’s floating dock for navy Tata Steel, ThyssenKrupp sign MoU to merge European units Sundram Fasteners rejigs international Kone India eyes further growth in elevator market Tata Motors charts investments in PV and CV businesses Toyota and Suzuki to introduce EVs in India by 2020 Gamesa to set up a plant in Nellore Tata Motors aims to be among the Top 3 global CV & PV firm Nissan exit shouldn’t affect ALL TVS Automobile invests Rs.75 crore in start-up firms The unexpected exit Hyundai India achieves 7 mn production at Chennai factory 29 per cent jump in TCS revenues New India Assurance posts impressive show AL wins Deming prize again It takes two to tango L&T profit up by 11 per cent ITC – steep excise hike V-Guard launches app-enabled water heater system Ode to Ratan Tata E.I.D Parry (India) Ltd: another sweet year Last stages PSU non-life firms seek to protect share Dish TV – subscriber additions encouraging Are they really independent? Consolidating leadership position in smartphones Tata gets 4-star rating for Zest Welcome focus to improve rural India... Rane targets Rs.5500 crore topline by 2018-19 When small is not so beautiful… Right to privacy – now it’s fundamental! Daimler’s truck exports from Chennai cross 5000 units M & M unveils driverless technology for tractors Preparing for the next growth curve Back in growth mode Mercedes-Benz sales continue to zoom He excels in the nuts and bolts of entrepreneurship Yamaha unveils scooter boutique
 
RoC in the dock...
The arrest of the Registrar of Companies, Manuneethi Cholan, by the CBI, on charges of corruption raises serious questions.

There are serious  allegations that the Registrar of Companies, a very senior officer of Indian Corporate Law Service (ICLS), acted as a pawn in a brewing corporate power struggle between a father (MAM Ramasamy) and his adopted son (M A M Muthiah) to take over the reins of the Chettinad Group.

 

The Chettinad Group

The Chettinad Group is a business conglomerate based in Chennai.  The group has a finger in  several pies. From companies that manufacture cement and silica to interests in construction, transport, power, coal, health care, plantations and textiles.  The family run empire also extends to education. The family established India’s first private university, the Annamalai University.  It was founded by the group’s founder Raja Sir Annamalai Chettiar.  The group has been run by Raja Annamalai Chettiar’s grand son Ramasamy and  Ramasamy’s adopted son M A M Muthiah. The two are chairman and managing director of the group respectively.

The kings and pawn in a corporate power game

According to information available in the public domain and the CBI, a group led by M A M Muthiah allegedly planned to take control of the Chettinad Group of Companies from Ramaswamy, chairman during the AGM of the flagship company Chettinad  Cements.  This was to be done by removing Ramasamy from the post of chairmanship of the group.  Apparently, Ramaswamy had fallen out of favour with his adopted son M A M Muthiah who, as the managing director of the group, had taken complete control.  It is alleged that in order to make his control total and absolute, Muthiah has proposed a resolution at the AGM to remove Ramaswamy from all positions of power in the Chettinad Group.  This, he claims in his interview to a newspaper was “done in the interest of shareholders and the employees of the group” because Ramasamy had “other interests to cater to.  

On learning of this proposed resolution,  Ramasamy had sought the services of Chozhan, the Registrar of Companies,  to reject the resolution approved by the shareholders for an illegal gratification.  As per the CBI, Chozhan had taken a bribe of Rs 10 lakh for not approving the decision for removal of Ramasamy.  The CBI had received a tip-off from an unnamed source about the bribe and the CBI intercepted his vehicle and recovered Rs 10 lakh from his car.  The arrest was made as Chozhan was leaving Ramaswamy’s palatial residence in Chennai.  The CBI also recovered Rs 20 lakh from Chozhan’s residence and several incriminating documents after a search was made in the office of Chettinad House and the chamber of  Chozhan.  

Now, what caused the rift between the father and the son is not for us to comment or speculate. Perhaps the ambitions of youth and the dreams of seeking greater heights for the Chettinad group at a rapid pace did not gel well with the cautious yet sturdy administration of his father.  Consider, for example, that the resolution sought to be expunged by Ramasamy was finally passed by the shareholders in the AGM and the shareholders also approved the group’s investments in the newprojects to the tune of over 370 crore.

Now, in all fairness, it is for shareholders to decide in a democratic manner who should hold office at the helm of their company.  If shareholders side with the glorious plans and youthful leadership of Muthiah than with Ramasamy, perhaps that is the right course of action for the company as the same represents collective democratic wisdom of the shareholders.   

 

Another look at the murky episode

But that’s not all.  There is another way to look at this murky episode.  Consider that the RoC under the Companies Act 2013 is vested with large powers. These encompass plenary powers of administration, control and investigation of  operations....  For example: the RoC is vested with powers to approve and reject forms filed under the Act and even has power to strike out the names of delinquent companies.  Thus he has the power to make or break a company.  This is why the case must be scrutinised with extreme diligence.   Now, it is one thing for corporate lords to fight amongst themselves for power and control, but it is completely another for a senior class I officer of Indian Corporate Law Service to play the fiddle and use his office as an outpost of a corporate empire.


Is venality a revelation for a deeper rot within?

The sheer levels of venality of the whole episode is a dangerous revelation.  Here is a senior officer who takes bribe in his own car, at the house of a corporate lord, as though he was buying a soda from a departmental store or drawing money from a bank.  Mark it, the officer did not even try to veil his illegal gratification through a mediator or a third party or a complex web of receipts.  This only reveals a very, very deep rot in our system.  

The venality of the whole episode casts a dark shadow which does not augur well for our corporate democracy and efficacy of company law as a whole.  In future, genuine questions will be raised and rightly so, on whether the action of the ICLS officers are free of corporate influence and are really taken in an unbiased manner. It is necessary that those at the helm of ICLS act with speed to redeem that faith again.  At stake is the interest of shareholders (especially interests of the small shareholders) and the public at large.  

 

Our recommendation...

It is recommended that the leadership at ICLS orders a thorough internal departmental investigation to ensure that various decisions taken by Chozhan and the likes are re-examined for propriety and issue remedial orders as may be necessary.  It’s also time that the leadership at the ICLS send a strong message to its officers that officers shall act only in public interest and follow scrupulously and conscientiously the rule book.  Unless, they make an example out of this case, we wouldn’t have learnt our lessons.

Author :
Reported On :
Sector :
Shoulder :
RELATED NEWS
ABOUT IE
IE, the business magazine from south was launched in 1968 and pioneered business journalism in south. Through the 45 years IE has been focusing on well-presented and well-researched articles. When giants in the industry stumbled to keep pace with the digital revolution, IE stayed affixed embracing technology.
Read more
 
PRIVACY POLICY
Economist Communications Ltd is committed to ensuring that your privacy is protected.
Read more
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
You agree that your use of this Website and the purchase of the magazine will be governed by these terms and conditions.
Read more
 
CONTACT US
S-15, Industrial Estate,
Guindy,
Chennai - 600 032.
PHONE: +91 44 22501236
EMAIL: indecom1968@gmail.com