Ad Here  
April
May
June
July
August
September
 
 
A historic indirect tax reform Star of the South Tax evaders’ get out of Jail-Free Card Reform this licence to…kill Babes In the wood-RBI North block has little clue to curb inflation The deluge and the several kindly souls A blueprint for the future Much can be done by us Sustainably developing manufacturing sector… Much ado about nothing Wanted: decentralised financial system Tryst with GST Two welcome measures from the chief minister... Welcome rains for damaged roads... Indian GST – Between extremes… When the examiner cheated... Pool energy prices South India’s 100 most valuable companies Economy through the month Babes In the wood-RBI North block has little clue to curb inflation Policy Makers Jobs - Lost, Changed or Gained Breaking news or breaking credibility? Why throw baby with bath water? Welcome move to widen the tax net… CAD and the emergency thereof INDIA keeps its date with destiny Ganesh’s mantras Technology and economic development should be linked Skewed Economic Zones? Cleansing Indian retail The Great Fall Outward ho Healthy finances of the Chennai Corporation BJP can now hasten its thrust for reforms After all, customer is the king Focus on southern TN... Weaving wealth of western Tamil Nadu 1800 parties registered with EC – Less than 60 contest elections PC please be our Santa Oh my GOLD What the big B should offer? No groundnuts in groundnut oil! An eco-friendly commute in Mysuru Sardar Sarovar – the seventy year itch Public investments and welfare will surge Land, land everywhere, but... Industry can’t get it from Mars, yet Focus on agriculture and human resources Need for radical RBI reform A gratifying record It’s raining funds for states. Really? An eventful week with VVIPs of Delhi Miles to go... Chennai Airport-Ready for a rapid take off... Need plan over the long term planning They add lustre to Padma Awards A tale of two Bihar babus If not Tamil Nadu, where else? TN - so much to offer... Low profile moves Deming awardees galore! Well-administered State Why (not) abolish? A Fine division of responsibilities CSR, tech revolution and bank crisis A dual GST that will protect prosperous states Make way for Make in India... Sowing seeds of hope Truce at Kasturi Buildings Research for survival... Better relations with UK... Kudos to GIM organisers... Rail-road Rajaraman In the horns of a dilemma How will it PAN OUT Little surplus after salaries, subsidies and debt servicing MS Installed Strategic planning the missing link Trail-blazing Tamil Nadu You too T M Krishna? Welcome Measures. Work for 10X Change
 
Sardar Sarovar – the seventy year itch
The benefit that would be ensured by SSP for the populations of the states of Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Rajasthan in terms of availability of water for drinking, irrigation and power, is much larger than the impact on a few thousand that were to be displaced.

Soon after Narendra Modi assumed charge as chief minister of Gujarat in 2001, he focused on making water availabe for every one of the state’s 18,144 villages. The state drought-prone, for years, understandably, demanded focus on water. The Modi government embarked on a massive programme of constructing check dams. With simultaneous focus on agriculture development, the state emerged leader in cotton and groundnut. This was also helped by the state laying separate power transmission lines for agriculture on one side and industry and domestic consumption on the other.

This focus got sharpened after the Supreme Court removed the hurdles for completing the Sardar Sarovar Project. 

SSP was envisaged by Sardar Patel seven decades ago and the foundation was laid by Jawaharlal Nehru in April 1961.

Chequered history...

SSP had a chequered history. Its progress was bogged down through familiar inter-state disputes. It took close to 18 years to constitute the Narmada Water Dispute Tribunal in October 1969; it gave the final award in December 1979.

Delays denied benefits to millions for decades

Then came the prolonged agitation launched by Medha Patkar and her Narmada Bachao Andolan. Disturbed political conditions and an extremely divisive nature of the society and polity paralysed decisive action.  The benefit that would be ensured by SSP for the populations of the states of Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Rajasthan in terms of availability of water for drinking, irrigation and power, was much larger than the impact on a few thousand that were to be displaced. Senior journalist Swaminathan Aiyar has cited findings of a research study by Prof Neeraj Kaushal of the Columbia University and himself on the impact. He concluded that the research exploded activists’ claims that moving out of the forest as disastrous for the tribals; he pointed to the much better living conditions and progress achieved by those tribals settled with liberal relief and rehabilitation support.

But Medha Patkar built an army of supporters to stall construction and succeeded in preventing funding by the World Bank. Post 2002 there was the added factor of the UPA government and Delhi media’s tirade against Modi that effectively stalled progress on SSP.

The court’s clearance and the BJP’s ascent to power with majority, were big help in the project getting completed. There was another extremely favourable development: all the four beneficial states of SSP are ruled by the BJP.

Sadly, the south does not have this precious advantage. For over six decades, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu have not been ruled by the same party - a major reason for the intractable litigation and reluctance of the Centre to implement the awards given by the highest court on the Cauvery water dispute.

Modi, so conscious of how precious water is, should help resolve this long pending issue. – SV

Author :
Reported On :
Sector :
Shoulder :
RELATED NEWS
ABOUT IE
IE, the business magazine from south was launched in 1968 and pioneered business journalism in south. Through the 45 years IE has been focusing on well-presented and well-researched articles. When giants in the industry stumbled to keep pace with the digital revolution, IE stayed affixed embracing technology.
Read more
 
PRIVACY POLICY
Economist Communications Ltd is committed to ensuring that your privacy is protected.
Read more
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
You agree that your use of this Website and the purchase of the magazine will be governed by these terms and conditions.
Read more
 
CONTACT US
S-15, Industrial Estate,
Guindy,
Chennai - 600 032.
PHONE: +91 44 22501236
EMAIL: indecom1968@gmail.com