Ad Here  
September
October
November
December
January
February
 
 
Well-administered State Outward ho Focus on agriculture and human resources Sardar Sarovar – the seventy year itch PC please be our Santa Make way for Make in India... Skewed Economic Zones? Much ado about nothing A historic indirect tax reform It’s raining funds for states. Really? Wanted: decentralised financial system Research for survival... Trail-blazing Tamil Nadu BJP can now hasten its thrust for reforms Economy through the month You too T M Krishna? An eco-friendly commute in Mysuru Why throw baby with bath water? The Great Fall Better relations with UK... Need for radical RBI reform A blueprint for the future Much can be done by us An eventful week with VVIPs of Delhi 1800 parties registered with EC – Less than 60 contest elections Why (not) abolish? No groundnuts in groundnut oil! After all, customer is the king Truce at Kasturi Buildings Deming awardees galore! TN - so much to offer... Cleansing Indian retail Low profile moves Policy Makers Little surplus after salaries, subsidies and debt servicing The deluge and the several kindly souls Indian GST – Between extremes… A gratifying record Chennai Airport-Ready for a rapid take off... CSR, tech revolution and bank crisis MS Installed Oh my GOLD Public investments and welfare will surge Rail-road Rajaraman Need plan over the long term planning Sustainably developing manufacturing sector… Healthy finances of the Chennai Corporation Pool energy prices Weaving wealth of western Tamil Nadu Welcome move to widen the tax net… Strategic planning the missing link Kudos to GIM organisers... Land, land everywhere, but... Industry can’t get it from Mars, yet Focus on southern TN... A Fine division of responsibilities CAD and the emergency thereof Welcome Measures. Work for 10X Change INDIA keeps its date with destiny They add lustre to Padma Awards When the examiner cheated... If not Tamil Nadu, where else? Babes In the wood-RBI North block has little clue to curb inflation What the big B should offer? A tale of two Bihar babus Breaking news or breaking credibility? Star of the South Technology and economic development should be linked Reform this licence to…kill A dual GST that will protect prosperous states Miles to go... Babes In the wood-RBI North block has little clue to curb inflation How will it PAN OUT Two welcome measures from the chief minister... Welcome rains for damaged roads... Sowing seeds of hope Tryst with GST South India’s 100 most valuable companies Tax evaders’ get out of Jail-Free Card Jobs - Lost, Changed or Gained In the horns of a dilemma Ganesh’s mantras
 
Sardar Sarovar – the seventy year itch
The benefit that would be ensured by SSP for the populations of the states of Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Rajasthan in terms of availability of water for drinking, irrigation and power, is much larger than the impact on a few thousand that were to be displaced.

Soon after Narendra Modi assumed charge as chief minister of Gujarat in 2001, he focused on making water availabe for every one of the state’s 18,144 villages. The state drought-prone, for years, understandably, demanded focus on water. The Modi government embarked on a massive programme of constructing check dams. With simultaneous focus on agriculture development, the state emerged leader in cotton and groundnut. This was also helped by the state laying separate power transmission lines for agriculture on one side and industry and domestic consumption on the other.

This focus got sharpened after the Supreme Court removed the hurdles for completing the Sardar Sarovar Project. 

SSP was envisaged by Sardar Patel seven decades ago and the foundation was laid by Jawaharlal Nehru in April 1961.

Chequered history...

SSP had a chequered history. Its progress was bogged down through familiar inter-state disputes. It took close to 18 years to constitute the Narmada Water Dispute Tribunal in October 1969; it gave the final award in December 1979.

Delays denied benefits to millions for decades

Then came the prolonged agitation launched by Medha Patkar and her Narmada Bachao Andolan. Disturbed political conditions and an extremely divisive nature of the society and polity paralysed decisive action.  The benefit that would be ensured by SSP for the populations of the states of Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Rajasthan in terms of availability of water for drinking, irrigation and power, was much larger than the impact on a few thousand that were to be displaced. Senior journalist Swaminathan Aiyar has cited findings of a research study by Prof Neeraj Kaushal of the Columbia University and himself on the impact. He concluded that the research exploded activists’ claims that moving out of the forest as disastrous for the tribals; he pointed to the much better living conditions and progress achieved by those tribals settled with liberal relief and rehabilitation support.

But Medha Patkar built an army of supporters to stall construction and succeeded in preventing funding by the World Bank. Post 2002 there was the added factor of the UPA government and Delhi media’s tirade against Modi that effectively stalled progress on SSP.

The court’s clearance and the BJP’s ascent to power with majority, were big help in the project getting completed. There was another extremely favourable development: all the four beneficial states of SSP are ruled by the BJP.

Sadly, the south does not have this precious advantage. For over six decades, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu have not been ruled by the same party - a major reason for the intractable litigation and reluctance of the Centre to implement the awards given by the highest court on the Cauvery water dispute.

Modi, so conscious of how precious water is, should help resolve this long pending issue. – SV

Author :
Reported On :
Sector :
Shoulder :
RELATED NEWS
ABOUT IE
IE, the business magazine from south was launched in 1968 and pioneered business journalism in south. Through the 45 years IE has been focusing on well-presented and well-researched articles. When giants in the industry stumbled to keep pace with the digital revolution, IE stayed affixed embracing technology.
Read more
 
PRIVACY POLICY
Economist Communications Ltd is committed to ensuring that your privacy is protected.
Read more
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
You agree that your use of this Website and the purchase of the magazine will be governed by these terms and conditions.
Read more
 
CONTACT US
S-15, Industrial Estate,
Guindy,
Chennai - 600 032.
PHONE: +91 44 22501236
EMAIL: indecom1968@gmail.com